Quote:
Originally Posted by tammix
that cartoon shows the extreme of using "freedom of speech" to reinforce police brutality first, and second, animal cruelty. That's obvious. As the chimp reference, that's not clear they refer to Obama. However, the reason the cartonist used the chimp figure is not clear and it should be explained. That's the people's right to know of context and also its a moral obligation for the cartoonist to do it.
|
haha.. what the fuck are you smoking? Animal cruelty? Police brutality? they shot a 200 pound rampaging chimpanzee that was ripping a woman to pieces, basically tore her face off, and who has no spent something like 20 hrs in surgery. Even its owner was stabbing it with a knife and begging the cops to come shoot it to save her friend in her 911 call.
i can't believe how fucking nuts some of you jackasses are. a cartoon according to you has to come with a disclaimer from the artist to clarify the joke... and he has a "moral obligation" to do so?
holy shit.