View Single Post
Old 06-25-2009, 07:49 PM  
gideongallery
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by kane View Post
Dude, they run a site that links directly to copyrighted material which then allows you to click it and download at your leisure. I am not going to argue the semantics of their guilt or innocents or the details of torrents vs seeds vs leeching vs the swarm vs whatever. The bottom line is this: Before the Wolverine movie came out (a few weeks before it was even in theaters) The Pirate Bay had links on their site that allowed you to download it. Every single person that downloaded that movie (and the MPAA estimates were that it was around 4 million - although probably all of those were not from The Pirate Bay) violated the copyright law. Maybe they weren't hosting it, maybe they weren't seeing it, but they linked to it knowing full well what it was. They facilitated it. I am of the opinion that sites like that should not be allowed to exist. Maybe they got a raw deal and this judge should have been removed but Karma is a bitch. When you make a ton of money facilitating theft sometimes things don't work out for you.
so your ok with being convicted of distributing kiddie porn without any proof because I
say you did.

they didn't have a single shred of evidence that the pirate bay was involved in the trading of copyright material.

It could have been completely traded based on the local peers being discoverd by the clients alone

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributed_hash_table


If you are so biased that you don't see finding someone guilty of commiting a crime that you didn't even prove they were present for is wrong, that just sad.
__________________

“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak
gideongallery is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote