View Single Post
Old 08-06-2009, 07:46 PM  
FightThisPatent
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,090
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post

add things like timeshifting, formating shifting and access shifting.
whoaaaa.... "posting" copyrighted porn material to a tube site has never been claimed to be time shifting.. its out right copyright infringement.

you are referring to mainstream stuff like tv shows, etc... we are talking about porn.



Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post

This is VCR type situation, one where you have to create a monetization policy that exploits the opp instead of trying to stop it.

this is what the P2P and MP3 "sharing" folks were crying about in trying to justify their ability to take advantage of digital distribution.

if a content owner doesn't want to have his creations digitally monetized, that's his right. An external website can't levy their "fair use" or "internet domain" philosophy to justify the theft.


I'm not sure if you are trying to justify tube sites existance and biz models, or you are off on a tangential topic.


Fight the wuh!
__________________

http://www.t3report.com
(where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! |
http://www.FightThePatent.com
| ICQ 52741957
FightThisPatent is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote