09-25-2009, 10:07 AM
|
|
sex dwarf
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 17,860
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stickyfingerz
You all know I am not a fan of his, but there is only toplessness on that tour, and unless she is using toys, or doing spreads, sexual simulations inside the members area 2257 really isn't necessary, but is good to have.
"Under a federal law, 18 U.S.C. § 2257, producers of a "visual depiction of an actual human being engaged in actual sexually explicit conduct" are required to keep records showing the ages of the models. It does not cover images produced before July 3, 1995, or depictions of simulated sexually explicit conduct."
Bash away for other reasons, but that isn't a good reason to bash.
|
Don't be too sure. Several cases against site owners with non-nude underage models established a precedent that defines sexually explicit conduct broadly enough to also cover suggestive non-nude poses.
__________________
/(bb|[^b]{2})/
|
|
|