Quote:
Originally Posted by billywatson
This is an issue NO ONE thinks about. Thanks for clarifying Michael.
I've had two girl flip out after a shoot -- and both were in AZ. I stood my ground and just let them re-read their releases...and offered to take down the material if they were reimburse me what they were compensated. It ended there.
Michael -- was it Vermont or New Hampshire that recently OK'd smut production?
|
It was New Hampshire....
As for condoms in porn, I doubt that this will pass. There are First Amendment issues. A performer might (I am not a First Amendment expert) have a free speech right to perform sans condom.
There are also less restrictive means to keeping performers safe - one test one shoot.
Price will come down on tests and more than likely producers and talent will share in the costs.
Based upon the revune, tax and legal implications of the industry leaving California, I just dont see it happening.