Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie
Wouldn't that be something? An actual user submitted porn tape that they shot themselves and then decided to put up on a tube site for free. Does one even exist anywhere? 
That's the funny thing. It's not like those sites have thousands of "user submitted" content (meaning user CREATED) and every once in a while a "real" porn vid that doesn't belong to the uploader slips in.
Nope, it's ALL stolen content with ZERO user created content. Hardly a "free speech" issue.
That's why gideongallery switches his argument back and forth between "censorship" and "time shifting" Whichever one fits his love of thieves at the moment. |
says the guy who claims that the only way the fair use of parody would allow the use of his content is to not use his content at all.
by your definition of fair use your right
luckly for me/fair use the court have ruled that simply changing adding comedic subtitles to someone elses video clip is more than enough to qualify as parody
see downfall parodies.
oh and btw timeshifting is for torrents
commentary (as in check you quest crews best dance routine) covers tube sites.
you might want to get the appropriate fair use for the medium.