Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDoc
And no, I think it's pathetic you spew moral values here when you basically support our Industry being ripped off.
|
that rich you claim to understand statisitical analysis but you use statistics to deliberately create a logical false arguement.
to misrepresent a scumbag slimeball cheat as some how legitimate.
Quote:
|
Many porn sites tell them about the limits, I stated that at least 10 times in this thread. Equal or better than netflix does.. again, I don't care how Brazzers does it, I know it's not Fraud through the numbers and I personally don't care what your uneducated view on the subject is.
|
your numbers were 1/200 charged back (.5%)
and you used that to prove that most people accept your definition of a trial.
how many people didn't accept the definition of a trial, felt ripped off but decided it a buck fuck it it not worth filling out all the paper work to get that money back.
all of those people don't really accept your definition of a trial but you "count" them as if you do.
the only way you could actually know if people really accepted your definition of "trial" is to split test them one telling them the conditions and another not telling them. If the definition in their minds was exactly the same there would be no difference between the two.
you know that if you put a phrase like "100% money back guarrentee" you increase sales not decrease them
since you made the bogus justification
Quote:
|
Any extra text slows your sales down... period.
|
it means when you actually tested it you lost sales.
so your numbers actually prove the opposite and your just misrepresenting them to make your bogus claim.