Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
that rich you claim to understand statisitical analysis but you use statistics to deliberately create a logical false arguement.
to misrepresent a scumbag slimeball cheat as some how legitimate.
|
Do you always write stupid like this?
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
your numbers were 1/200 charged back (.5%)
and you used that to prove that most people accept your definition of a trial.
how many people didn't accept the definition of a trial, felt ripped off but decided it a buck fuck it it not worth filling out all the paper work to get that money back.
all of those people don't really accept your definition of a trial but you "count" them as if you do.
|
I had a .5% before and a .5% after - so the answer is zero!
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
the only way you could actually know if people really accepted your definition of "trial" is to split test them one telling them the conditions and another not telling them. If the definition in their minds was exactly the same there would be no difference between the two.
you know that if you put a phrase like "100% money back guarrentee" you increase sales not decrease them
since you made the bogus justification
|
Yep, I did split testing too... we aren't allowed to put money back guarantee up..
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
it means when you actually tested it you lost sales.
so your numbers actually prove the opposite and your just misrepresenting them to make your bogus claim.
|
I tested lots of text, any text that isn't part of the actual promo cuts the ratios, any text, anything, period. Even good text can hurt you.
End of the day you not know 'anything' about this Industry or business, or torrents, videos, piracy, etc.. your a bad pathological liar.... straight up.