Quote:
Originally Posted by Jdoughs
I don't think that 13 links could make a large difference even if you chose really poor links. Remember, linkspun doesn't make trades, chose links, pick anchors for your sites and trades, and then add those deals to your websites, you do all that. All linkspun does is give you a tool to find and track them with. It's a user based system, and has no footprint so very hard to say its 'linkspuns fault'. It just tracks the trades that you find, and you agree to.
If you just made a bunch of recent changes to the site, I would be willing to bet that was the reason. Combined with the fact that the serps have been very active last 2 weeks, lots of movement.
But still, I think 13 links is nowhere near enough to 'cost' you rankings.
|
True, I just thought maybe Google noticed the 13 new links that I put up all of a sudden and also noticed I have 14 new sites hardlinking me all at once with the same anchor text. And thought maybe they didn't like that or something. You know a lot about this stuff though so that's good to hear.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mmcfadden
Do any of these tweaks involve an i-frame near the top of page?
|
Nope. Not even a geo iframe banner or anything..
Quote:
Originally Posted by ~Ray
did you add 14 new outgoing links to get those 13 incoming links? Or was it a-b-c one way link trading?
|
Half are just straight up 2 sites linking each other trades, other half are "you link this site of mine with this site of yours and ill link another site of yours with another site of mine" trades. lol I don't have a very good grasp on what the a-b-c trade stuff means yet.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Agent 488
i moved up a couple pages on a competitive term party from trades from there.
|
That's what I'm expecting in the long run, that's what it's for afterall? I'm pretty sure my SE listings dropped because of me screwing up my keyword density (which is VERY high, but it works apparently) with these new gals I posted... but it's fixed now so hopefully I regain my shit.