Quote:
Originally Posted by NaughtyVisions
I didn't say it was a good argument... 
I didn't know there was case law on it. I had heard the argument presented before, and then it just disappeared. I was wondering what happened with it. I'm in Pennsylvania, and sometimes it takes awhile to hear stuff back this way in Amish Country. 
Thanks for answering that for me though.  |
Actors/actresses/stuntmen in mainstream have been employees for 20 yrs. In porn there was a decision in a work comp case in which for WC purposes, performers are employees.
Under the IRS standard of review you may be sucessful in arguing that someone that only worked once/twice may not be an employee for tax purposes only.