Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug of Montreal
We mention it but don't take points away. Our focus these days is on vids.
|
Some people enjoy video and some enjoy photography and some enjoy text. I know, in my niche, I've seen review sites give high scores to dead sites with like 20 updates ever, while dinging photography sites which update daily. And I never see text even mentioned in scoring and only occasionally in the review itself.
It seems like reviewing a photo site based on video content is a lot like reviewing a BBW site based on how slender the talent is.
Is there anything a frustrated webmaster can do to address this?