http://www.xbiz.com/news/128375
Quote:
The judge said that a great deal of information has already been released and disclosed to the public through the Washington Times and that "the sexual nature of the misconduct reinforces the need to protect the privacy interests of these individuals."'
'One employee said that if his identity was revealed, he would be subject to ?severe personal and professional harm including embarrassment and disgrace, possible loss of my current job [and] future employment opportunities' and certain, immediate and severe harm to his family," the ruling stated.
|
Yay for porn at work. Some judge out there's wacking off to porn in chambers.