Quote:
Originally Posted by CamTraffic
nice story
there is no doubt about the content quality at brazzers, don't Jules jourdan shoots Most of it?
and that member area is fucking flawless ( updates, navigation, stream quality, delivery methods, you name it...), thus the rebills
not kissing ass, just saying... i see a lot of shit talkers here with the worth member areas
|
I seriously don't know where you get the idea it's quality content. Yes it's shot on good cameras, yes it's lit well. These are elementary and can be done so easily anyone with the minimum skill can bring it off.
The quality is in the content of the scene. No porn consumer gets off on the crispness of the image or lighting. The scenes are contrived, fake and not very well done. Ive posted a link to a scene and no one seems to want to comment on it.
After 30 years of producing and consuming porn I have an idea of what a porn scene should contain. The scenes I saw on Brazzers don't contain them.
Here was the comments for that scene I sent to Fabian.
Quote:
Much better music, still too loud though,
The intro was far too long. The instructor should have been there from the beginning.
The part with him standing behind her was also too long, as if the shooter is trying to stretch it out.
Tell the shooter to keep his finger off the zoom button and pan slower.
It's not a big boob movie but the guy is spending ages playing with her tits????
Also wide screen doesn't work if the guy and girl are standing up and the shooter is framing from the waist up. Makes a scenic film, not great for porn.
17:19. Why is he shooting this angle for so long. No one wants to see his dick. Unless she's working on it. 
Just pan into him licking her.
No close up of him licking her???
She deeps throat's him with her hand covering the bottom of his dick???
20: 50 The models are straight onto the camera and the shooter is shooting from one angle. From the guys feet. Tell the shooter he's allowed to move around. LOL
Got bored again at this point and fast forwarded. It didn't get much better.
The problem IMO is the skills of the shooter or director. They could of done a much better job. Too often it was wide angle and the models were upright, which leads to more scenery than people. Wide angle is great for shooting couples because the shooter can get so much of the couple in WHEN the lay down or go doggy.
I think this is a different shooter than the last scene.
|
The bold is basic flaws an experienced shooter would never make. A lot of the scenes on Brazzers contain similar flaws.