Quote:
Originally Posted by amacontent
They are not pornstars unless they have a cock in thier mouth or AT LEAST eating pussy.
SOLO GIRLS ARE NOT PORNSTARS !!
|
If the average person viewing porn does not recognize the person by name alone
then the person is not a porn star.
The porn industry has only had a handful of "stars" ever.
We don't even bother to put credits on the film like "Staring So-and-So".
So how can anyone claim to be using porn stars when they don't even put the
person's name on the video?
A porn actor will be known to every content producer in the world and be considered
by producers to be a porn star, yet the porn consumers don't even know the
performers name even after seeing them in 10 films.
And people wonder why conversions are tough.
We should try letting the consumers know something about who/what we are selling.
When's the last time a sponsor released a decent porn star interview clip to
try and build a brand for the star?
We keep waiting for stardom to happen magically while not realizing that stardom
is controlled by the media. The media creates the star, that's why we have Paris Hilton
and Kim Kardashian. But the media is mainstream and therefore does not attempt
to create "porn stars". The industry has to create the star by pumping the stars
brand. The solo site is the closest thing this industry has to trying to create a
star. And the only reason it can create a star is because the site is named after
the performer. Name recognition is what creates a star.
We don't even put the fucking names on the videos.
We're fucking dumb.
