Quote:
Originally Posted by digitaldivas
I like topshots, soles don't really do it for me. Also her toenails are super short and not painted. And the symmetry of the camera angles is weird. I would have really liked a relaxed shot of her foot, so I could see the width of her toenail beds and the length of her toes just a bit more... Good lookin' out though  Hope your well, sir. |
That's your thing, though... I've found as many foot niches as "regular" vanilla niches (blonde, boobs, booty, etc...) Some don't like the relaxed-foot thing - and they like the crinkly bent-toes look of the sole, others it has to be dirty feet, or just bare feet in denim... it goes on and on...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vjo
I was just gonna say you can tell the op is not really into feet. Foot guys like top shots over soles and toes painted is always better and almost required. |
Some foot guys do, but others like bottoms. Though the painted nails seems pretty universal.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vjo
Black/white or obtuse is never good. You want symetrical, pretty, petite,
|
You could say this about any "niche" - whether it's hardcore or any body-type kink or fetish.
I agree the "moon shots" are kinda creepy though - and yet there's some who'd be into that I bet :P
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vjo
Also feet and faces and people are tied together. Very few guys (altho some can) dig an ugly babe's feet even if she has nice feet.
They find them attractive but the person and face is critical. It is all tied in. It is not just the feet. It is the person's feet.
|
This is true, and universal - who can like long legs or big boobs only, regardless if you think the babe's face is grody? I think some do - considering those big boob niches where the model's face is always blurred or chopped out - but mostly any niche or fetish also depends on the overall hotness of the model. Paper bags are for the unknown comic...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin
She's cute. Id much rather see her nude.
|
Oh, in that case:
:D