TheSquealer

Everybody lock your doors, get a gun, protect yourself! Mr. Paul Markham is planning to deface a social fabric that was already deteriorating! Before I say anything else, let me remind him that he's like the man behind the curtain in the Wizard of Oz. Pull back the curtain of elitism and you'll see an uneducated dirtbag hiding behind it, furiously pulling the levers of jingoism in a coprophagous attempt to convince others that the worst kinds of polyloquent authoritarians there are are the "chosen people" of scriptural prophecy. That sort of discovery should make any sane person realize that I can easily see Paul performing the following unambitious acts. First, he will offer stones instead of bread to the emotional and spiritual hungers of the world. Then, he will exclude all people and proposals that oppose his pertinacious, spiteful ruses. I do not profess to know how likely is the eventuality I have outlined, but it is a distinct possibility to be kept in mind.

Some people I know say that we will need to use diverse skills and tactics if we are to express our concerns about Paul's balmy, uncouth hariolations. Others argue that the notion that his sermons are a perfect example of overgeneralization and blatant plagiarism is pervasive. At this point the distinction is largely academic given that Paul's position that he has mystical powers of divination and prophecy is based upon a specious argument without any substantive basis. I'll go further: Someone has been giving his brain a very thorough washing, and now Paul is trying to do the same to us. To state it in stark and simple terms, Paul is still going around insisting that he is as innocent as a newborn lamb. Jeez, I thought I had made it perfectly clear to him that he generally tries to keep his distance from the appalling purveyors of malice and hatred who set the wolf to mind the sheep. However, Paul sees nothing wrong with using rock music, with its savage, tribal, orgiastic beat, to generate alienation and withdrawal. Ah the sweet, sweet smell of hypocrisy.

Paul insists that he has no choice but to destabilize society. His reasoning is that taxpayers are a magic purse that never runs out of gold. Yes, I realize that that argument makes no sense, but Paul wants nothing less than to spoil the whole Zen Buddhist New Age mystical rock-worshipping aura of our body chakras. His apostles then wonder, "What's wrong with that?" Well, there's not much to be done with pusillanimous, infernal potlickers who can't figure out what's wrong with that, but the rest of us can plainly see that Paul keeps telling us that embracing a system of separatism will make everything right with the world. Are we also supposed to believe that he is a martyr for freedom and a victim of mandarinism? I didn't think so.

The law is not just a moral stance. It is the consensus of society on our minimum standards of behavior. Whatever your age, you now have only one choice. That choice is between a democratic, peace-loving regime that, you hope, may delegitimize Paul and, as the alternative, the petulant and crapulous dirigisme currently being forced upon us by Paul. Choose carefully because paternalism has served as the justification for the butchering, torture, and enslavement of more people than any other "ism". That's why it's Paul's favorite; it makes it easy for him to prey on people's fear of political and economic instability.

Paul has stated that I'm some sort of cully who can be duped into believing that he is a refined gentleman with the soundest education and morals you can imagine. That's just pure chauvinism. Well, in Paul's case, it might be pure ignorance, seeing that Paul would like to see patriotism, honor, and personal responsibility fall into desuetude. I've said that before and I've said it often, but perhaps I haven't been concrete enough or specific enough, so now I'll try to remedy those shortcomings. I'll try to be a lot more specific and concrete when I explain that there appears to be some disagreement in the community regarding the number of times that Paul has been seen setting the hoops through which we all must jump. Some say once; some say five times; some say a dozen times or more. The point is not to quibble over numbers or anything like that but rather to clarify that the final product of Paul's arguments will be a dysfunctional society, wherein every natural self-defense mechanism has been short-circuited in some ill-natured effort to gain short-term financial benefits. Now that last statement is a bit of an oversimplification, an overgeneralization. But it is nevertheless substantially true.

You shouldn't let yourself be flummoxed by Paul's fast talk and air of self-confidence. Sad, but true. And it'll only get worse if Paul finds a way to talk about you and me in terms that are not fit to be repeated. He and his apologists are on a recruiting campaign, trying to convince everyone they meet to participate in blackmailing politicians into turning the world's most civilized societies into pestholes of death, disease, and horror. Don't join that crime syndicate; instead, remember the scriptures: "Thou shalt not follow a multitude to do evil."

My press releases are clearly in defense of decency and human dignity and violate nobody's rights. What's my problem, then? Allow me to present it in the form of a question: Why is it that 99 times out of 100, Paul's fulminations are attributable to an ignorance born of fear? The answer to that question has broad implications. For example, at no time in the past did self-righteous flakes shamble through the streets of cities, demanding rights they imagine some supernatural power has bestowed upon them.

Paul must sense his own irremediable inferiority. That's why he is so desperate to attack the critical realism and impassive objectivity that are the central epistemological foundations of the scientific worldview; it's the only way for him to distinguish himself from the herd. It would be a lot nicer, however, if Paul also realized that he uses his victim status as a kind of magic incantation to stifle debate, disparage critical analysis, and persuade us that his anecdotes won't be used for political retribution. The sooner he comes to grips with that reality, the better for all of us.

Somebody has to fight scurrility and slander. That somebody can be you. In any case, Paul says he's going to assail all that is holy when you least expect it. Is he out of his mind? The answer is fairly obvious when you consider that when he was first found making bargains with the devil, I was scared. I was scared not only for my personal safety; I was scared for the people I love. And now that Paul is planning to bring discord, confusion, and frustration into our personal and public lives, I'm downright terrified.

Paul should hide his head in shame before the judgment of future generations, whose tongue it will no longer be possible to stop and which, therefore, will say what today all of us know to be true: Some mischievous junkies actually avouch that people are pawns to be used and manipulated. This is the kind of muddled thinking that Paul is encouraging with his epithets. Even worse, all those who raise their voice against this brainwashing campaign are denounced as impulsive, barbaric knuckle-draggers. Besides being totally offensive and abusive, Mr. Paul Markham's squibs are seriously defamatory. Since I don't have anything more to say on that subject, I'll politely get off my soapbox now.

__________________
.
Yes, fewer illegal immigrants working equates to more job opportunities for American citizens.

Rochard