Quote:
Originally Posted by MaDalton
what happened to the times when they were all 16 - like Samantha Fox ;)
|
good old sun for thast.
posting pics of 16 year old toplesas on there 16th bithday then next page a story about pedo's.
though the law has changed and you need to be 18 today.
odly i am against page 3.
the reason being is that (while the sun insists on natural and not fake boobs) i feel its led to thousands of women feeling that only big boobs are sexy and need to have boob jobs.
i also find it odd that the sun is a 'family' newspaper and prints topless pics.
i would not wish my doughter (if i had one) to see these pis each day. not becase i am against porn, but becase i would not want her to have a complex about her body.
in fact i have written a few timews to jacky smith (i think thats the mp's name) saying that. a few years ago shew was on tv, and i sent in an email saying i did porn but felt page 3 gave women a complex. they read it out, with the remark saying they were not sure if it was a fake email.
i have no problems with topless or nude in the sunday sport (if its still going) as thats more a comic.
if page 3 had different types of women, to me that would not be a problem. but it tends to be only while big boobed blond women. to me it should also have small chested women as they are just as sexy. and alt girls too.