View Single Post
Old 02-05-2012, 08:21 AM  
FLFHoles
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackmonsters View Post
Well, if she wins the law suit, the DA will have grounds to charge her with possession of
obscene material.
It's not illegal to possess obscene material with the exception of CP or Bestiality only to disseminate obscene material. So if she was using torrents and was sending packets while she was receiving packets, then she would be guilty of obscenity distribution. I forget the exact case but I believe it was Georgia and maybe Sirkin who argued on the legality of being able to possess it legally but not being able to purchase it which creates a catch-22.

Her strategy isn't that bad. If the courts can find the material obscene then the company cannot allege infringement because you cannot copyright obscenity. If it can be proven obscene, the DA won't give a shit about the downloaded because they will have a much bigger fish to fry with the pornographer.
FLFHoles is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote