Quote:
Originally Posted by Choker
Obamacare is MAKING private insurance companies provide this for free. If you do not see how the government telling a PRIVATE company how to conduct it's business is serious problem, well I don't know man.
The argument that it's cheaper to provide the pills than take care of poor kids is valid, but at the cost of throwing out the rights of a private company to conduct business as it needs to? Not to mention the fact that forcing insurance companies to do this results in MY PREMIUMS going up. SO in the end I have to pay for womens birth control pills. There's a million ways to look at this issue.
|
It's not provided for free, our taxes would pay for it... working women wouldn't get it for free, they would have insurance or pay for it through taxes. However if the women is poor, lives in a state that does not provide assistance, or is part of a religion or ends up in a hospital, that all "refuse" to provide for her, then Obama's policy would kick in, if she has no insurance. Again, paid for through our taxes, because a religion refused to honor a womens choice.
You're mad at the wrong person.
A business is a regulation, every corp has regs, some more than others... some suck, some are bad, and some are very good and very needed. A serious problem is what was happening to make these regulations happen, like religion forcing a womens choice is a constitutional violation - which far out weights a corps rights......... which are ZERO!
Your premiums went up for the last 10, 20+ years, and your coverage went down... and even without Obamacare, it would have went up and continue to do so. You pay for poor women that can't afford it already, at a much higher premium rate.... typically hitting both the state and the fed.
But hey... your money is more important than a womens rights. Of course you would be singing a totally different song if you were a women that needed this.