02-10-2012, 03:55 PM
|
|
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Orlando
Posts: 9,024
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDoc
It's not provided for free, our taxes would pay for it... working women wouldn't get it for free, they would have insurance or pay for it through taxes. However if the women is poor, lives in a state that does not provide assistance, or is part of a religion or ends up in a hospital, that all "refuse" to provide for her, then Obama's policy would kick in, if she has no insurance. Again, paid for through our taxes, because a religion refused to honor a womens choice.
You're mad at the wrong person.
A business is a regulation, every corp has regs, some more than others... some suck, some are bad, and some are very good and very needed. A serious problem is what was happening to make these regulations happen, like religion forcing a womens choice is a constitutional violation - which far out weights a corps rights......... which are ZERO!
Your premiums went up for the last 10, 20+ years, and your coverage went down... and even without Obamacare, it would have went up and continue to do so. You pay for poor women that can't afford it already, at a much higher premium rate.... typically hitting both the state and the fed.
But hey... your money is more important than a womens rights. Of course you would be singing a totally different song if you were a women that needed this.
|
You sound like a socailist. Yes my money is more important to me and my family than a woman who needs birth control that I have no idea who she is. You sound just like Obama. If I were a woman who couldn't afford birth control I wouldn't going asking strangers on the street for money, would you? There really is no difference here.
|
|
|