CurrentlySober

Looking back, with the benefit of both time and hindsight... What do YOU think?

I remember the big court cas, and reading the transcripts etc, and at the time, I thought (Based on the transcripts) that he was guilty.

I also thought, based on the 'Hush Money' payments (BEFORE THE BIG COURT CASE) that he was guilty. Why? Because my logic was that if I were ever accused of anything, as abhorrant as that, and I was innocent, that I would use my wealth to prove myself innocent in public court...

But he didn't - He simply 'Paid Them Off...'

Then, when the big case came along, he DID fight it...

So what do you think? Guilty or not guilty? Yes or No ?

__________________

My Dream Gal... XXX