View Single Post
Old 04-22-2012, 03:30 PM  
jimmycooper
Confirmed User
 
jimmycooper's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 4,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by ottopottomouse View Post
101. Photos were better in the 80s.
102. You're all on ignore but I still read everything LOL

-

Interesting list. Does seem to be an abundance of expensively equipped takers of crappy pictures now. I often think the best photos are spur of the moment capturing an event or something unusual rather than prepared.
My theory, which i admit to being completely made up and not based on any fact whatsoever, is that the unintended consequence of all the progress being made from a technological standpoint is that it can breed laziness and even overwhelm photographers who might not have a full grasp of the new features. Does that make sense?

Right now, and just for the sake of having a new hobby or whatever, I'm on the hunt for either a Canon AE-1 or Nikon F2. Both are highly regarded SLRs from the 70s which can still be purchased and serviced at a reasonable price. My thinking is that costs associated with developing film will cause me to be more careful and more selective in taking each shot and that in having to deal with what will probably be more than a few annoying nuances which tend to be absent whilst using a modern DSLR will give me a better, more comprehensive understanding of how things work.
__________________


Last edited by jimmycooper; 04-22-2012 at 03:33 PM..
jimmycooper is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote