05-04-2012, 09:05 AM
|
|
Registered User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 36
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pseudonymous
If you read my post, i was referring to ownership of the domain. Nobody who knows what theyre doing would agree to that because of the risk involved. Theres more risk for a company who does all the work to make the website money.
The only people who would agree to that are people who are desperate and tripping over their feet to do a site for you (the ones that will fail) not the ones who can make the sites 10k+/month gross
I dont suspect a model will respond to my post with, yeah youre probably right, i will come back here and bump this thread 12 months after the launch :/
If you can name me 5 successful softcore solo sites to launch in the past 2 1/2 years. Then you might change my mind somewhat but you wont be able to. And thats including big reputable companies, nevermind a model and a webmaster that hasn't launched anything remotely big recently. Its 2012 and solo sites are a thing of the past (almost), if the big boys are backing out, thinking a model who is outsourcing her webmaster work can do it, well its not likely. Im not trying to criticize, just giving my opinion on it all considering im one of the few still launching websites so i think its an opinion you should take into consideration
Few left out there that can do anything and none of them would give a model the service of turning their photos/videos into a high source of revenue while keeping that business in the models names. You should consider properly written contracts, that makes more sense
|
i agree to points mentioned ;)
|
|
|