Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterPeabody
I can understand a thread being closed or even deleted if it's about someone's reputation being soiled wrongly (meaning, someone accused them of something illegal but the accusation was false, etc).
Could this fall under that category? Just asking.
|
Bingo - we have a winner.
The thread is not deleted, but moved to a closed off section where it can be retrieved in the event of future legal reasons.
But with that said, over the years we have been hounded, spat on, harassed, and lied about over and over again. Most times by the same people, or the same people behind it. It has not been fair, and it has been repeated over and over again. It is of course damaging to us, but more importantly, it could be damaging to our clients - which is the last thing we would ever want. So when this came up again this time, by someone behind yet another "nick", the final straw was broken.
Since the MPA2 (not MPA3) incident a DECADE ago took place, we have repeatedly apologized.
It has been many many years, and many things have happened in our industry. With us, our clients, and our competition.
Here are some posts in OLD threads that hopefully can shed some light on the issue:
01/02/2006:
https://gfy.com/showpost.php?p=8980451&postcount=34
Highlight of post by Garry:
"
I will tell the story again.
When we started to write the MPA2 program like 6 ( SIX ) years ago we got told that this would probably be a great feature to add. Stupid as we where we wrote this in and started to promote the program, then we pretty fast got reactions from not only webmasters who have seen the online demo BUT also from program owners. We realized how stupid this was and we took it out from the code.
Yes we did a mistake and we are really sorry for that. But we where just a programming company that programmed what was requested at that time. You have to remember that the adult business was totally different back in 2000 when we first wrote the mpa2, and the code wasn't for long in the program either before we took it out of all programs!"
12/07/2004:
https://gfy.com/showpost.php?p=6014128&postcount=1
Highlight of post by Garry:
"
Yes we did a bad choice when we gave after for adding the module and for that we are sorry, but we have learned and we have paid our price. "
**
Signupdamnit (whoever you "anonymous" person is) -
We find it highly suspicious that you have spent so much time on finding negative information about us after all those years, yet couldn't find these. Did you do all this work all on your own?
Things that makes you go hmmmmm...
Oystein