Quote:
Originally Posted by marcop
I really like the way glamcore looks--the high production value really add something. The problem for me is that in glamcore there seems to be an inverse relationship between the production values and the heat in the scene; i.e., the better the production values, the lamer the action.
Also, as someone else mentioned rather coarsely earlier, there's usually too much of the guys in the frame for my tastes. Maybe that's meant to attract a female audience, but it's probably off-putting for the male portion of the audience... at least for the thoroughly heterosexual portion of the male audience.
The thing that goes through my head when I watch that kind of material is, "Why are these guys producing porn? They'd earn a lot more money making commercials." Which is probably a) because I'm bored, and, b) because I think they're wasting their talents making bad porn when they could be making a lot more money making bad commercials.
|
I think this style is still in it's infancy and evolving. I know others, as well as myself who produce this material are constantly re-evaluating how we shoot to make it better and more appealing to a wider audience. But I don't think it'll ever have the same audience as ATK for example. This type of material is targeted to a different class of people. Someone who appreciates a higher production value and who doesn't mind if the "heat" is not as pronounced. "Heat" is a viable component but it's not the only component and certainly to some, not an overly important component. One man might watch a scene and feel no heat while another might think there was plenty of heat
