|
I pondered posting this here 2 days ago but figured yall would read it on my blog.
This is an interesting case and it does have implications on the industry
In California you MUST notify any person you are going to have sexual contact with prior to. He didn't and she is suing him civilly (this is not at this time a criminal case) civil means only a simple majority of the jury must agree with her for her to win.
how hard will it be to convince that jury that this was "sexual contact" because how would they feel had it been them? My bet is that they would have wanted to be notified.
And Billy raises a VERY interesting point...John would almost certainly test non reactive for HIV using the current industry testing protocols. Karen admitted as much in AVN yesterday when she stated that John has been "undetectable for HIV for 15 years"
Bad timing on this whole thing...once again it underscores AHF's claim that we need condoms and cant be trusted to govern ourselves.
__________________
Mike South
It's No wonder I took up drugs and alcohol, it's the only way I could dumb myself down enough to cope with the morons in this biz.
|