Quote:
Originally Posted by signupdamnit
Compared to when the url wasn't there it is being screwed over. Now that you think it's okay now why not make the url bigger? Why not put it on the banners too (which some already do)? You see where this is going.
If you don't deserve credit for that 1% of impressions you are sending because you aren't paying processing costs then why do you deserve anything at all?
The whole point of the deal used to be that the affiliate gets their cut on the business they send the sponsor. Over time the rules have changed for the worst for the affiliate. Just because it is the normal thing now doesn't mean it is right or that everyone has to accept it. Like I said I think this stuff is why so many moved on.
|
OK, so no watermark. How about titles? How about credits? How about images with names on them? A surfer can figure out how to find a website from these things even without watermarks.
We also used to give out 30 second clips for MGPs and free galleries but no longer do. So what? Bottom line: If you, the affiliate, cannot cope with losing however many type-ins you may lose then yes, you should not be an affiliate. But try being one for mainstream then come back realizing in adult, when you get ass-raped, at least we provide some lube.