Quote:
Originally Posted by deltav
Ah I get it, so the NY Times can't report on a story that includes the topics of Iran & Uranium, or it's propaganda in your book no matter how mild the writing is. I saw no sensationalism in there at all, just sort of story that might make a Coen Brothers movie someday.
The irony is... you cry Propaganda at something minor like that and get all outraged about the perceived manipulations, but previously have started threads linking to literally the propaganda wing of the Islamic Republic of Iran and claimed it as objective news. Or more recently, your link to that pro-Assad mouthpiece masquerading (not very well) as some human rights group.
But your brain isn't wired for detecting your hypocrisy or for self-examination like that - you'll just keep on plugging away in your simplified little world.
|
This thread alone goes to show how ignorant people are on matters such as this. Iran is a producer of Uranium. So when people who don't know any better see the words Uranium and Iran they make comments such as "this shows how easy it would actually be to buy the shit if you wanted it" not knowing that most Iranians can probably go in their back yard and dig it up. The Immigration officer turned wannabe NSA agent obviously had no idea about it, neither did the so called saleman as well as most people who read the headlines claiming Iran was trying to acquire something they already have plenty of.