Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo
I appreciate your reply.
creationism isn't science, it's a belief system, so I don't think it applies here.
|
It's a belief system that the Right has fought to get taught in schools and have done so successfully. In their minds it "IS" science hence the reason that if they support it as a science how can their judgment on actual science related topics be trusted?
Really you know it as well as I do that there is no "real" argument among the scientific community about man having an effect on global warming. It's a argument being waged by political figures from the right wing.
Anything can of course be proven wrong, who knows maybe Jesus did ride with dinosaurs, however at some point you have to agree with simple logic and work with the best information you have at that time.
The information we have at this time, shows that we are having an affect ad we should try to stop it. Perhaps maybe in time that information will be dis-proven or further proven to be right. The question is, is the little evidence that doesn't support it worth the risk of doing nothing if the scientist are right?