Quote:
Originally Posted by editeur
You might be right... or not. Who knows. I think there wouldn't be any repercussions though - the NATO will just pretend that the new members weren't 'real' members and the real NATO is its founding members from the West Europe, US, AU etc, and when someone attack the 'real' members NATO do stand for them and do something. They will even find some snake word for this - not 'betrayal' but something like 'quantitative easing', hehe. Because the NATO countries bar the US and maybe UK won't have any choice anyway - they are not enough independent to ask questions. There will be short sanctions for the time of active warfare, then sanctions will be lifted to allow businesses make profit to keep ths 2.5% growth and make population happy. The population, which couldn't care less for people in other countries. Also there's no alternative for the Russian gas anyway yet, and won't be for any foreseable future.
|
And then? What the fuck are you going on about? If Russia enters (attacks) a NATO country? Yes, most analyzers agree that unless its one of the "core" members, NATO would not dare strike back since its risking a nuclear war.
On the other hand, can you bet your life on it? Or the existence of your entire nation? The Russians with their 99% approval of a dictator with a tiny dick just need to remember how many people they lost last time we had a lunatic in Europe. Yet they fail to see that little piece of shit for what he really is just because it?s one of their own?