Quote:
Originally Posted by PR_Glen
I actually came in here to say that this is a pretty rare occurrence and this is easily something that can be taken out of context but then you came in here with your 'do a little research' bullshit and pissed all over anyones argument for owning one... bravo.
They are naturally nasty and aggressive and they aren't screened for violence or anything else which is why they will never be accepted as a breed in the AKC. You have to train them not to be violent, just as you would most dogs. The difference is THEY ARE STRONG AND FUCKING DANGEROUS compared to ANY BREED. Yes, even the evil terrible chow chow, and the ominous labrador retriever that is clearly killing more people than rabid alligators according to your cherry picked stats..
You shouldn't be advising anyone on this subject, you clearly don't know dogs at all.
|
My "do a little research" suggestion was the furthest thing from bullshit. Arguments based on popular bias aren't arguments.
Pitbulls aren't "naturally nasty" and aren't inherently aggressive. No dog is. The AKC doesn't recognize the term "pitbull" but recognizes most pit-bull terrier breeds if they aren't mixed, which most dogs we know as "pitbulls" are.
Dogs just have to be trained, educated, raised as loving members of a family - human or otherwise. They don't need to be trained or taught OUT of being aggressive. They're usually "trained" INTO being nasty.
As with most situations, the humans are the determining factor.
Take a read:
http://bslnews.files.wordpress.com/2...lities-ncr.pdf
:D