Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo
nice, someone can reply to a valid question with a valid answer. Appreciated.
What's odd is the report authors went out of their way to include a ~paragraph highlighting the fact that, even though those reasons have been shown to contribute, there is no obvious reasons for the dying trees. It's specific in the study. No obvious reasons.
And sure, manmade global warming is about the Earf, not specifically this region only, but that's also a problem in terms of motivation. I'll ask you, would/will you alter your lifestyle in your country because some trees in USA may or may not die in the next 50 years due to unknown reasons?
|
What do you mean with obvious? Isn't some wildfires and beetles quite obvious? Or change in temperatures and specie specific treeline shifting obvious? You can examine all those things as those are easily measurable.
Your question is presented in certain way to mock the issue, but I still answer yes. Although you didn't say what kind of lifestyle changes, so it's easy to answer yes.