Quote:
Originally Posted by pornmasta
they did it for their idea of freedom of speech like they did in the past with the church and the pope
|
so freedom of speech is the freedom to insult anybody without having a real reason nobody can explain for 100$?
you seem to think that I do not unerstand freedom of speech and the idiocracy in the fact that some radical shit head thinks you should not print shit...I get this 100%
what I do not get is:
THIS:---------------> 200 people died last time, and its just a SHITTY cartoon...why excercise your "freedom of speech" when your message is second hand toilet paper and last time somebody did it 200 people died? what kind of person does this?
dude if their message was: "torture and killing in the arab world" I would understand 100% it would be a complete outrage...but a cartoon???????
come on man? 200 dead last time it happened and you call this "Freedom of speech"? how about responsibility? what about caring for innocent people who will get caught in the crossifre? shit 5 people are dead already the muslim cop with no gun who got executed just for being there and the 4 hostages from the other attack...
I argue that it was an irresponsible message and would love if somebody could explain why in fact they were not ordinary trolls looking to make a $ with sensationalist shit?