Quote:
Originally Posted by MediaGuy
This wasn't really about Iran getting nukes, and neither is the framework agreement they've ironed out. It's about Bachmann using a wholly inappropriate and sad event overseas as an analogy for the international group of five countries to negotiate Iranian transparency and compliancy with nuclear non-proliferation (the agreement which Iran signed and the US did not, btw).
But the deal doesn't give Iran nukes. And it's not "his" deal. There are five countries plus Iran involved in the negotiation.
:D
:D
|
you are completely misinformed/uninformed. you don't get that nukes is the term for nuclear technology. you are not aware the deal is exactly about iran keeping their nuclear manufacturing capability intact and moving forward to become a nuclear nation. you're the one who stated that this thread is about the dr strangelove like comment she made.
you're the one that doesn't get that this is entirely BO's deal, the dealmakers are in fact john kerry and zarif, with kerry reporting hourly to BO and the other 5 countries going along with BO.
but what's worse is you don't get at all that the problem here is letting iran have nukes AT ALL. instead of them spending 10s of billions of dollars on nuke manufacturing and ballistic missiles why haven't they sunk that money in solar farms? do you really think the 1 nuke power plant they are capable of building trumps the power they could generate from acres and acres of solar farms in the sprawling wasteland of a desert?
but in the hysteria to point fingers at bachmann, common sense gets lost and BO's giving iran the OK to become a nuclear nation is a grandstanding moment.
inform yourself before pointing fingers.