Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo
you are completely misinformed/uninformed. you don't get that nukes is the term for nuclear technology. you are not aware the deal is exactly about iran keeping their nuclear manufacturing capability intact and moving forward to become a nuclear nation. you're the one who stated that this thread is about the dr strangelove like comment she made.
you're the one that doesn't get that this is entirely BO's deal, the dealmakers are in fact john kerry and zarif, with kerry reporting hourly to BO and the other 5 countries going along with BO.
but what's worse is you don't get at all that the problem here is letting iran have nukes AT ALL. instead of them spending 10s of billions of dollars on nuke manufacturing and ballistic missiles why haven't they sunk that money in solar farms? do you really think the 1 nuke power plant they are capable of building trumps the power they could generate from acres and acres of solar farms in the sprawling wasteland of a desert?
but in the hysteria to point fingers at bachmann, common sense gets lost and BO's giving iran the OK to become a nuclear nation is a grandstanding moment.
inform yourself before pointing fingers.
|
Perhaps their plan is to show the world that they can responsibly handle nuclear energy so they might be able to build more power plants in the future.
To me the options are simple:
1. Deny them nuclear energy at all costs which will likely further radicalize the nation and cause more instability not to mention they may still then go ahead with their nuclear program just to spite us.
or
2. We try to find a common ground to deal with them allow them nuclear energy and keep an eye on what they are doing to make certain they are not making nuclear bombs.
Either option comes with risks. The question is which is the one the has the higher potential upside.