Originally Posted by Joshua G

im not really suggesting change. just a far away observation that a population in the 10s of millions voluntarily chooses to live in a region rife with earthquakes, fires, landslides & drought. reminds me of the people who live in new orleans, underneath the sea level, in a region rife with large hurricanes.

& ironic a state full of progressive environmentalists live in a region that is unable to sustain a giant population without substantial technology innovations like aqueducts & re-enforced homes/bridges.

not to mention the surreal politics of water management where some federal agreement in 1920 whatever gives some people better "rights" over water than others. but the top 1% will keep watering their lawns, conservation & selflessness be damned!