Quote:
Originally Posted by CyberSEO
You can use any other word here. When your neighbor allows your potential enemy to place there a nuclear weapon which targets you, this doesn't mean anything good for that neighbor. Like as I said, we already had this situation in 1962.
|
Except that Poland perceives Russia as a threat... It's sort of a "bad neighbor" situation already.
Quote:
|
Do you have any other way to destroy the nuclear missile silos? It will be very interesting to hear about them.
|
Yes, you don't need a nuclear weapon to destroy a nuclear weapon - it's not indestructible, and a nuclear weapon could even be shot out of the air to begin with. It's absolutely possible to destroy a missle silo without nuclear weapons.
Quote:
|
How many military bases were created by Russia since its independence (1991)? How many by NATO? How many military conflicts were started by Russian army? How many by NATO armies? The one don't have to be a rocket scientist to find out who is the real (not portrayed) aggressor.
|
I really don't know, I don't follow that. Everything comes down to OIL. Russia has oil and natural gas, most of the NATO countries do not. They are securing their interests, so that Russia does not have them by the balls.
Quote:
|
Sure they are different. There were no nukes near Russian borders in 1962. Now Poles are going to allow the United States to use their country as a lunch pad for their nukes (wanna be their cannon fodder). Seems like now the situation is much worse than then. I'm not Nostradamus, but just believe me - if Poland will do that, the situation will get out of control immediately.
|
It won't get out of control immediately anymore then this whole Turkey thing got out of control. Do you think nukes in Germany pose any less threat to Russia? They are in range as well...
Quote:
1) Kaliningrad is a Russian territory. Russia does not need for somebody's permission on where exactly it should store its nuclear missiles. Do the Americans ask somebody where they have to place nukes inside of their own country?
2) They were in Kaliningrad for all the time. Nothing has really changed.
|
So wait, Russia doesn't need anyone's permission to put nukes on it's territory, but Poland does? Russia can have have nukes in Kaliningrad, on Poland's border, but Poland can't have the same? Why are the rules different for Poland?