Quote:
Originally Posted by **********
LOL!!
This will be an interesting event. Legally speaking, aren't they terrorists?
|
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2383
Quote:
18 U.S. Code § 2383 - Rebellion or insurrection
Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
|
And your 2nd Amendment right to bear arms is revoked for life too?
Quote:
Search Results
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) defines terrorism as “the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.”Sep 13, 2011
|
They have no political or social objectives the just want to use force to; "in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof"
Seizing the BLM property forcibly is not ''domestic terrorism". However, the insurrectionists are in open rebellion of the US government, the US Federal Courts, US policy and US laws. They took federal property in protest of US Court sentences given out to 2 ranchers that burnt federal lands.
https://reason.com/blog/2016/01/04/r...nspired-oregon
Quote:
|
[T]he 9th Circuit noted that a teenaged relative who barely escaped the flames "testified that Steven had instructed him to drop lit matches on the ground so as to 'light up the whole country on fire.'"...
|
Domestic terrorism might be car bombing federal buildings or similar.