Quote:
Originally Posted by **********
Fun video, but the video quality itself isn't that good. It looks like very compressed 2k at best. Detail in the image seems smudged, the frame rate seems low, etc. Is it possible it wasn't rendered correctly? Make you can put up a couple of links to the same video with different quality settings so we can give you feedback on the difference?
|
and that's my issue too....to put 4k up on the web takes massive compression, so any pixel depth gained will be squashed during that process. Also, how many people actually have the monitors to appreciate the quality increase? Even 2k isn't necessary at this point, and if I watch something on ePorner and they have the option for 1080p I go for 720p at most because I don't want any loading problems because of file size. The quality difference is barely negligible to me (or maybe I don't care), and I'm a digital artist who deals with pixels all day.
I'd much rather have the bandwidth go to higher frame rates...now that's something cool because it makes the action look more lifelike.
But my main point was I don't think that's a great video. I'm sure that chick has an audience who will drool over that, but I want to see hot young 20 year olds with perfect bodies oiled up and getting fucked. For me, Lubed.com is an example of someone with the right idea. They can do 4k because that content is awesome looking, but I wouldn't care if it was standard def because the girls are hot, and there's some great moviemaking skills on display.
the core product is king...who gives a shit about all of the gimmicks?