adultmobile

Said this, we still do some filtering about who we register, and we limit the number of models online, that's old habits that have a meaning for small sites, but not really for big ones.

Sure the webcams market it is evolving, and people must adapt, but it is not evolving into "quality content controlled, edited by cam site director". This is actually the past and evolution was against that original idea.

True evolutions - that challenge the old business models - are others. ONe it was the free shows funded by tips... really, funded by other site paid show, splitcammed and rebroadcasted for free everywhere else in hope to get extra tips for the same. It really didn't started as: tip me and I will show you. It started that girls was splitcamming in all sites, and forgot to close other sites while in private in jasmin or streamate etc., and so people seen the private show for free in myfreecams and such, which was smart enough to allow this in free area. After others learned this method, almost everyone allowed and users became aware and it was quite a change for everyone.

Yet, when a guy like one specific girl, will waste all his money with her in private no matter there are thousands of other girls showing for free live, this is what everyone wanting to work with cams it should understand. If a guy wants a model that's her and the rest of the world, free or more quality, does not apply.

Another evolution it is sites relaxing the rules about don't give personal contacts. We never had this rule in place, since it was boring to police all the chats and video (girls used to write in paper their contact and show in video briefly, so not to show in chat logs etc.). Many performers (even if will never admit it in a forum) move the guys out of the cam sites and across cam sites (with their affiliate ID) all the time. At start I fighted this with nazi admins, but I ended up thinking that this is ok as long as I get as many stolen clients in site, as many as are stolen out. It's just matter if give a nice % for who brings the guy, so.. some girls bring guy away, some bring into, is ok. And by the way, even if again most girls will not admit in a forum, 99% of the traffic they get in their twitter is simply guys who google their cam site nicknake in the cam site, so yet another way to steal customers out of cam sites. The sad thing that all the traffic is in the cam sites which in turn it comes from the affiliates, the biggest of which are the tubes.

More than that, there is skype billing. Since the trend is girls getting in toich with the guys... in skype.. why not bill in skype video calls directly. I liked that and implemented that thanks to skyprivate plugin. Something no any cam site wanted to do, since the no direct contacts with client rule in first place. But I tend not to make big dramas about innovations, and tried it. So far, I see the guys like it, but most girls don't use it, as the girls prefer to just work the hours in cam site then off. Instead, having the beggar fan in skype it can be a 24/7 babysitting. I will have probably to add models who are more used to guys in skype (perhaps western models), and less into cam site only, preferined shifts (east europe studio girls).

And no, I don't think VR will be that next big thing in cam. At least not in the next 10 years, maybe in 20. It depends by the devices - brain teleported reality may increase adoption. In the meantime, bad light, slow framerate 2d cams with the girl of dreams (that may be eventually not sweet, not pretty and even rude with the guy), still cash the most.

__________________

TubeCamGirl.com