View Single Post
Old 10-09-2016, 10:36 PM  
Joshua G
dumb libs love censorship
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,198
Quote:
Originally Posted by kane View Post
You have said multiple times that Nate Silver is corrupt and can't be taken seriously. . . as a matter of fact you do this a lot. You say polls are fake until they give you the result you like. You say Nate Silver can't be trusted, but now you use him as an example of how Hillary is leading.

Which is it. Is Nate Silver not to be trusted, or is he?
no kane...nates number is bullshit. his map is a liberal fudge factory, look at all the blue in the rust belt, & florida. please...you know i think trump will win, so my number is much different than nate silvers 80%. i posted my map in my own thread that outlines which swing states i think trump captures. i give trump up to 313 electoral votes.

i simply used nate as a publicly known quantity that is providing an election probability. had i cited an obscure poll or gambling site, would you trust that number?

Joshua G is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote