Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackCrayon
well if all the games were played and then spectators got to vote on who they think played the best or who would is the best team, i would agree its a good analogy but thats not how it works.
|
- campaigning in each state is just like playing each game in baseball...
- convincing voters to vote for you, is just like scoring a point in baseball
so for example, in FL:
Clinton scored 4,485,745 "points"
Trump scored 4,605,515 "points"
so Trump won that "game"
- you then play the same "game" in each state
- team that wins majority of "games" wins it all
I don't see where the flaw in the analogy is?