Quote:
Originally Posted by onwebcam
|
Are you in favour of companies being able to maximise profits like this?
Or would you like a better system that costs half the money?
Quote:
Originally Posted by onwebcam
It's really going to ruffle your feathers when Paul proposes an actual sensible plan isn't it? Obama's legacy disaster of a bill gone and replaced by a republican. 
"The freedom to choose inexpensive insurance free of government dictates," Rand Paul
|
Seems you're against such a better and cheaper system.
Quote:
Originally Posted by onwebcam
Sorry, but you can't expect a for profit business to act like a government and/or charity. They have investors to answer to. If there's an area of the business taking on huge losses it's their responsibility to cut it out.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by onwebcam
There's only so many billions one can lose. Again these aren't charities or governments.
|
And ready to get ass raped as well. What happens when a for-profit company decides you've become to expensive to carry after years of making them money?