What idea is more delusional: the wall or the vetting?
This is a tough one to call...both are very very stupid but lets look at them and try to decide:
1) The wall
Pros - It is very amusing
Cons- It costs a fortune and you can climb over with a 30$ wallmart rope ladder...and re-use the ladder...
2) Vetting from countries that are muslim because terrorists
Pros - It is very amusing
Cons- No terrorist in the world will favor being vetted for 2 years over good old border hopping...why on earth would he apply to be vetted? why not buy a ticket to mexico or canada and walk over?
I honestly can not decide on which one is more stupid...If I was forced to vote I would say wall because its such a monumental waste of money but the idea that some terrorist would apply to be vetted is also delusional as fuck...
what do you think?
__________________
 Report a suspicious cracker: Click Here
|