Quote:
Originally Posted by shiraz9944
Just because most of the EU relies on the UK and DE to fund pretty much everything and defend them against all aggressors, I think the UK took the logical approach. They have the most extensive surveillance program in the world with the GCHQ and CCTV practically covering the entire city of London feeding into them. They got sick of the open borders, terrorist attacks, and funding most of what they didn't use. I like that 360 billion bill Trump gave to Merkel for all the NATO spending the US provides. You think nothing is changing in the EU? Look to Germany, Merkel will be lucky if she survives her election, Hollande is basically out, the nordic nations have already elected far right parliaments. Things are changing for sure, why didn't you mention that you can't travel openly anymore in the EU? That your nation id doesn't provide free border crossing anymore?
|
first, if weīre going to bring the US into this EU discussion, thereīs no money asked from the EU to the US, Trump doesnīt know anything about NATO & the spending.
What you also do not realise is that the EU gives back to the UK a better subsidiary than what is known. The UK have already began plans to cut costs & corners because the EU gives rules and regs to bring the EU together & not have itīs huge gaps. Britainīs always been the closed closet, Germany about education & Spain about family & open rules, as with Holland, Belgium, France, the Netherlands pretty much the rest of Europe.
Already the British government have planned to forget the sats tests for the youth...
SATs tests for seven-year-olds could be axed under new government plans - Mirror Online
letīs wait until there are less police stations, hospitals & fire forces around the UK, less work on the play areas & parks, countrysides & roads in general.
I give 5 years & already thereīll be a difference. I feel sorry for the youth with less education & the OAPīs with less care
