View Single Post
Old 06-27-2019, 04:31 PM  
HairyChick
Slowly dying
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Padanaram
Posts: 3,091
Quote:
Originally Posted by GFED View Post
Sounds like she deserves to be charged. She instigated the outcome and put her child's life in danger.
If you argue with someone, you don’t normally expect to be shot. The shooter intentionally killed the unborn baby rather than shooting the mother in the head to kill her. She caused lifelong pain to that woman.

The mother should be charged with endangering the life of an unborn child. No one knows if the child would have lived if not shot. Miscarriages, SIDS, premature birth, etc. She endangered the unborn child and the guilt of that is forever. Charge her with stupidity err a minor crime, mandatory counseling, give high school kids a lecture on fighting while pregnant. Let her tragedy teach others about consequences.

Pregnant women shouldn’t be in cars, walk in public, go shopping, stay at home, go to school or eat food.

Huh?? Cars have accidents, people are hit by cars walking, people can be shot in stores, electrical malfunctions in houses cause explosions, school students are shot and food can have salmonella.

You can’t protect pregnant women from the world. Common sense and protectiveness count.
__________________
*****************************************
Anti-Semites have Small Penis Syndrome. The only known treatment is electroshock therapy combined with cerebellum removal. Fortunately, it’s a tiny procedure.
*****************************************
HairyChick is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote