Originally Posted by drexl

Concerns about them:


- they file against legit material, ie: promotools licensed by cam sponsors.

- they file notices that are unrelated to the URLs they include in the report. For example they file a notice for model M1 of Chaturbate and in the list of presumed offending URLs it shows: M2 of StripChat, M3 of StripChat , ...etc ...

- they are inconsiderate: they also add generic URLs thus de-indexing entire pages such as "[domain]/tags/livecams"


Also: can they be competitors who want to get an unfair advantage by de-indexing other webmasters? I find strange that some cam sites don't seem to be affected by those "agents".