Quote:
Originally Posted by ladida
Lack of creativity from the gfy crowd. Not surprising. Yes, let's file a case with incentive that porn company can't advertise to kids. That's what you would do.
Meanwhile, lawyers don't lack such creativity, as seen in all the latest "me 2" movements where people are being sued left and right for "rape" that happened 20-30 years a go and there's no real evidence. Where people get to "pick" their gender and that's normal so its just a matter of time cp will be legalized as 40 year old pedo will say he is 6 year old girl (already happening in some countries). Where pornstars can overturn contracts. Where males compete with women in sports because they are "female".
Yes, in these cases, discrimination against a porn company and performers presented in correct way will fail.
Just needs money and right lawyers.
|
BTW:
Every single country in EU can legally ban porn, there is not such thing like pornography protected by freedom of speech here. There are rulings of The European Court of Human Rights which clearly state that every country can set their own boundaries when protecting morals. And you believe they would win this with creativity?
Pornhub promoted pornography on a social network which can not only make their own rules but they are also obliged by law to protect children and morality. Comparing a profile of a porn company to a pic of the fat Kardashian's ass that was created for a completely different purpose just shows they don't get the point at all - and their "creative" lawyers too...
You are so clueless...