Quote:
Originally Posted by plsureking
we've got some really nice examples of saturation in our industry. tgps get big, so everybody builds one. tubes get big, so everybody builds one. what happens is original content becomes rare.
of course big tech can detect AI generated content. absolutely. they've published studies and built tools for it.
a million people using chatgpt to write a marketing landing page will get similar results. that's the whole point of it. consistent and accurate results will look the same for multiple people.
these tools weren't created for lazy people who don't want to do their jobs anymore.
#
|
What is "the job" that generative AI lets "non-lazy people" do?
And is the work product of such efforts of any value? To whom?
It seems that producing a consistent, intentionally limited, output benefits mostly those who are vested in maintaining that output/narrative, while consciously obscuring actual critical authoritative, competence-based, information.
Incomplete, even misleading, fluff overshadows (by volume), displaces, and ultimately replaces authoritative knowledge.
To keep it in perspective, adult entertainment is all about fluff - unless you're dealing with safety in the industry, and health-related issues.
And where other, non-X-biz, more serious affairs are concerned, socially, politically, gen AI is an even greater threat to objective understanding.
