Quote:
Originally posted by Rich
That's the maximum, and it was for illegal sites such as beastility and child porn accesible to minors if I'm not mistaken. If I remember correctly this law was NOT going to affect pay sites or AVS sites at all. (thank God for me, lol).
|
You think it was ruled unconstitutional to protect bestiality and child porn? No, it was ruled unconstitutional because it violated the court's interpretation of what the first amendment protects.
You are correct that pay sites and AVS would have likely not been targeted. I don't see that argument as any different than the many adult webmasters who think the chance of the current admin prosecuting them in particular as being very low. You are making the same argument Republicans are. "I don't think it will effect me so who cares?"